"conversaciones telefónicas" in English

Everybody knew that the dictatorial authorities were monitoring telephone conversations.

When we debate the draft legislation tabled before us, we must take into account four issues.

The secret services permanently monitor the telephone conversations of the current government's political opponents.

First, the conditions under which telephone conversations can be recorded have now been stipulated unambiguously.

It is undoubtedly the case that information about telephone conversations can be of value in various criminal investigations.

What we are trying to do today, in other words, is not to store the results of phone-tapping, the content of telephone conversations.

Again, it comes down to daily video chats, which she says are far better (and, frankly, cheaper) than phone conversations.

The provisions relating to monitoring and recording of telephone conversations have also been significantly improved in the conciliation text.

Every day, a host of personal data, for example in connection with telephone conversations and payments on the Internet, is recorded and put into circulation.

There are companies today who provide free phone calls if the user accepts that he will occasionally be interrupted by advertisements.

That does not, however, mean that we should give the green light to the extensive and systematic retention of both telephone conversations and e-mails.

It is our duty to discover whether conversations in the European Parliament and the European Union are being listened to using ISDN digital systems.

I am nevertheless extremely surprised, and indeed shocked, by some of the assertions that have been made here, in which data retention has been put on a par with the use of torture chambers.

Information obtained by listening in on telephone conversations under dubious conditions is not ending up with the relevant bodies, but is appearing in various media.

Mr Di Pietro's proposal to omit the current Article 18 regarding intercepting telecommunications, amongst other things, is understandable, although very strict.

Mr Di Pietro' s proposal to omit the current Article 18 regarding intercepting telecommunications, amongst other things, is understandable, although very strict.

I have so far not been convinced by the arguments for developing extensive systems for storing data, telephone conversations, e-mails and text messages.

I have received letters, emails and representations from people who fear that governments will be able to listen to their telephone conversations and read their emails!