"no está" in English

I should like to point out that the Commission is not in favour of guide levels.

The EU should now send a very clear signal that it does not accept this conduct.

The European Parliament is not tackling the core issue, because it is divisive!

That is not the way to get people enthusiastic about a European constitution.

Firstly, this amendment is tabled not by the group but by myself, as rapporteur.

Europe is hardly doing anything in this regard, but could be doing a great deal.

The objectives of this strategy have not been achieved through its implementation.

However, I wished to make this explanation of vote to emphasise its importance.

Unfortunately, this proposal was not taken up by the European interior ministers.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is not about politics, it is about people's health.

Europe's towns are still left to stand on their own; they are not being helped.

But we will not succumb to this pressure, based on the arguments I have submitted.

Regrettably, the budget line for minority languages is not included here as yet.

The European Union does not support such measures with extraterritorial effect.

There are four reasons why I personally felt I could not endorse this motion.

The current example of E10 in Germany demonstrates that this is not happening.

If they refuse to cooperate, they will be partly responsible for the misery.

This sort of ambiguity cannot go on, and we hope that the Council will admit that.

Unless they make those choices they will never get to grips with the traffickers.

This must not be transformed into a mere ceremony with the vaguest of declarations.