"experimentación con animales" in English

Animal testing should be carried out only in the absence of any alternatives.

The Commission's ultimate aim is to abolish animal testing completely.

Our objective is the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing.

For this reason, we are calling for a ban on duplicating animal testing.

Animal testing is a highly controversial area and involves a moral dilemma.

We need human health to be ensured and we need animal testing to be stopped.

It is right to refine, reduce and replace animal testing wherever possible.

Of course, no one is in favour of animal testing.

These figures are likely to be distressing to those concerned about the testing of animals.

Therefore, let us keep our research and, in particular, let us also keep animal experimentation.

We also want to see animal tests reduced.

Animal experiments should be seen as exceptions to the rule rather than normal scientific procedures.

This is completely unacceptable since, as well as being extremely cruel, animal testing is crude and inefficient.

It showed that the Commission is keen on moving towards an end to animal experimentation whenever possible.

However, whilst this remains the end goal, we are not yet in a position to end animal experimentation altogether.

A total ban on all animal testing would endanger the safety of cosmetics and therefore human health.

Where good alternatives to animal testing are available, these must be used, as we want less animal testing.

Right, we said in the committee second reading, let there be no more animal experiments in the field of cosmetics.

No other issue has taken Parliament so long to deal with as that of animal testing in the matter of cosmetic products.

It will lead to the management of animal testing within the European Union, thereby answering the criticism of exporting the problem.