"dna a" in Spanish

It is also important to highlight the privacy aspect which the use of DNA demands.

We believe that under no circumstances should human life, including human DNA, be patented.

Here we have a person declaring his innocence and asking to undergo DNA testing.

We are in particular considering moving away from the present approach of the DNA-protein criterion.

This has left a residue in the DNA of the people and, more importantly, the leadership.

Why has DNA analysis not been accepted, when it is very much state-of-the-art?

We see a danger, for example, in the uncontrolled use of DNA testing.

It has even proved possible to detect foreign DNA later in the cells of the body.

I would therefore call for this DNA test to become a Europe-wide requirement.

The essence of this is not just about the use of DNA databases.

These do contain residues of modified DNA in a verifiable manner.

A functioning exchange of DNA already exists through Interpol.

But she is proposing labelling based on the detection of modified DNA or modified proteins.

There is an unnatural combination of strains and DNA in the virus.

Our enzyme capability is programmed into our DNA; some people have more, and some have less.

It seems to be that you have to look for an explanation in the foundational DNA of the two polities.

With the advent of DNA recombinant technology human relaxin has become available for evaluation.

DNA tests have changed the public thinking and many States in America enforce more and more a mandatory delay for the executions.

On one body, which was found disfigured – allegedly one of the victims – no DNA test was carried out.

And that it is precisely this combined formula which can have such harmful long-term effects on the human DNA.